Table of Contents

RFC 4949 Internet Security Glossary Definitions O

Return to RFC 4949 Internet Security Glossary Definitions, RFC 4949 Internet Security Glossary, RFC 4949 Internet Security Glossary Bibliography, Cybersecurity, Awesome Security

RFC 4949: RFC 4949 Internet Security Glossary Definitions Symbols | start, RFC 4949 Internet Security Glossary Definitions A | A, RFC 4949 Internet Security Glossary Definitions B | B, RFC 4949 Internet Security Glossary Definitions C | C, RFC 4949 Internet Security Glossary Definitions D | D, RFC 4949 Internet Security Glossary Definitions E | E, RFC 4949 Internet Security Glossary Definitions F | F, RFC 4949 Internet Security Glossary Definitions G | G, RFC 4949 Internet Security Glossary Definitions H | H, RFC 4949 Internet Security Glossary Definitions I | I, RFC 4949 Internet Security Glossary Definitions J | J, RFC 4949 Internet Security Glossary Definitions K | K, RFC 4949 Internet Security Glossary Definitions L | L, RFC 4949 Internet Security Glossary Definitions M | M, RFC 4949 Internet Security Glossary Definitions N | N, RFC 4949 Internet Security Glossary Definitions O | O, RFC 4949 Internet Security Glossary Definitions P | P, RFC 4949 Internet Security Glossary Definitions Q | Q, RFC 4949 Internet Security Glossary Definitions R | R, RFC 4949 Internet Security Glossary Definitions S | S, RFC 4949 Internet Security Glossary Definitions T | T, RFC 4949 Internet Security Glossary Definitions U | U, RFC 4949 Internet Security Glossary Definitions V | V, RFC 4949 Internet Security Glossary Definitions W | W, RFC 4949 Internet Security Glossary Definitions X | X, RFC 4949 Internet Security Glossary Definitions Y | Y, RFC 4949 Internet Security Glossary Definitions Z | Z (navbar_rfc4949)


([[Fair Use]] [[Source]]: [[RFC 4949])


(I) A key establishment protocol (proposed for IPsec but superseded by IKE) based on the Diffie-Hellman-Merkle algorithm and designed to be a compatible component of ISAKMP. [R2412]

Tutorial: OAKLEY establishes a shared key with an assigned identifier and associated authenticated identities for parties;

Shirey Informational Page 202]

RFC 4949 Internet Security Glossary, Version 2 August 2007

i.e., OAKLEY provides authentication service to ensure the entities of each other's id[[entity, even if the Diffie-Hellman- Merkle exchange is threatened by active wiretapping. Also, it provides public-key forward secrecy for the shared key and supports key updates, incorporation of keys distributed by out-of- band mechanisms, and user-defined abstract group structures for use with Diffie-Hellman-Merkle.

([[Fair Use]] [[Source]]: [[RFC 4949])


(I) /formal model/ Trusted-system modeling usage: A system component that contains or receives information. (See: Bell- LaPadula model, object reuse, trusted system.)

([[Fair Use]] [[Source]]: [[RFC 4949])


1. (N) An official, globally unique name for a thing, written as a sequence of integers (which are formed and assigned as defined in the ASN.1 standard) and used to reference the thing in abstract specifications and during negotiation of security services in a protocol.

2. (O) “A value (distinguishable from all other such values) [that] is associated with an object.” [X680]

Tutorial: Objects named by OIDs are leaves of the object identifier tree (which is similar to but different from the X.500 Directory Information Tree). Each arc (i.e., each branch of the tree) is labeled with a non-negative integer. An OID is the sequence of integers on the path leading from the root of the tree to a named object.

The OID tree has three arcs immediately below the root: {0} for use by ITU-T, {1} for use by ISO, and {2} for use by both jointly. Below ITU-T are four arcs, where {0 0} is for ITU-T recommendations. Below {0 0} are 26 arcs, one for each series of recommendations starting with the letters A to Z, and below these are arcs for each recommendation. Thus, the OID for ITU-T Recommendation X.509 is {0 0 24 509}. Below ISO are four arcs, where {1 0 }is for ISO standards, and below these are arcs for each ISO standard. Thus, the OID for ISO/IEC 9594-8 (the ISO number for X.509) is {1 0 9594 8}.

ANSI registers organization names below the branch {joint-iso- ccitt(2) country(16) US(840) organization(1) gov(101) csor(3)}. The NIST CSOR records PKI objects below the branch {joint-iso-itu- t(2) country(16) us(840) organization (1) gov(101) csor(3)}. The U.S. DoD registers INFOSEC objects below the branch {joint-iso- itu-t(2) country(16) us(840) organization(1) gov(101) dod(2) infosec(1)}.

Shirey Informational Page 203]

RFC 4949 Internet Security Glossary, Version 2 August 2007

The IETF's Public-Key Infrastructure (pkix) Working Group registers PKI objects below the branch {iso(1) identified- organization(3) dod(6) internet(1) security(5) mechanisms(5) pkix(7)}. [R3280]

([[Fair Use]] [[Source]]: [[RFC 4949])


(N) /COMPUSEC/ Reassignment and reuse of an area of a storage medium (e.g., random-access memory, floppy disk, magnetic tape) that once contained sensitive data objects. Before being reassigned for use by a new subject, the area needs to be erased or, in some cases, purged. [NCS04] (See: object.)

([[Fair Use]] [[Source]]: [[RFC 4949])


(I) A type of threat action that interrupts delivery of system services by hindering system operations. (See: disruption.)

Tutorial: This type of threat action includes the following subtypes: - “Interference”: Disruption of system operations by blocking communication of user data or control information. (See: jamming.) - “Overload”: Hindrance of system operation by placing excess burden on the performance capabilities of a system component. (See: flooding.)

([[Fair Use]] [[Source]]: [[RFC 4949])


(I) See: Online Certificate Status Protocol.

([[Fair Use]] [[Source]]: [[RFC 4949])


(I) A data unit of eight bits. (Compare: byte.)

Usage: This term is used in networking (especially in OSI standards) in preference to “byte”, because some systems use “byte” for data storage units of a size other than eight bits.

([[Fair Use]] [[Source]]: [[RFC 4949])


(N) See: output feedback.

([[Fair Use]] [[Source]]: [[RFC 4949])


(I) See: secondary definition under “attack”.

([[Fair Use]] [[Source]]: [[RFC 4949])


(D) That minuscule fraction of time in which you realize that your private key has been compromised.

Deprecated Usage: IDOCs SHOULD NOT use this term; it is a joke for English speakers. (See: Deprecated Usage under “Green Book”.)

Shirey Informational Page 204]

RFC 4949 Internet Security Glossary, Version 2 August 2007

([[Fair Use]] [[Source]]: [[RFC 4949])


(N) See: object identifier.

([[Fair Use]] [[Source]]: [[RFC 4949])


(I) An Internet protocol [R2560] used by a client to obtain from a server the validity status and other information about a digital certificate. (Mentioned in [X509] but not specified there.)

Tutorial: In some applications, such as those involving high-value commercial transactions, it may be necessary either (a) to obtain certificate revocation status that is timelier than is possible with CRLs or (b) to obtain other kinds of status information. OCSP may be used to determine the current revocation status of a digital certificate, in lieu of or as a supplement to checking against a periodic CRL. An OCSP client issues a status request to an OCSP server and suspends acceptance of the certificate in question until the server provides a response.

([[Fair Use]] [[Source]]: [[RFC 4949])


1. (N) A manual encryption system in the form of a paper pad for one-time use.

2. (I) An encryption algorithm in which the key is a random sequence of symbols and each symbol is used for encryption only one time – i.e., used to encrypt only one plaintext symbol and thus produce only one ciphertext symbol – and a copy of the key is used similarly for decryption.

Tutorial: To ensure one-time use, the copy of the key used for encryption is destroyed after use, as is the copy used for decryption. This is the only encryption algorithm that is truly unbreakable, even given unlimited resources for cryptanalysis [Schn], but key management costs and synchronization problems make it impractical except in special situations.

([[Fair Use]] [[Source]]: [[RFC 4949])


1. (I) /not capitalized/ A “one-time password” is a simple authentication technique in which each password is used only once as authentication information that verifies an id[[entity. This technique counters the threat of a replay attack that uses passwords captured by wiretapping.

2. (I) /capitalized/ “One-Time Password” is an Internet protocol [R2289] that is based on S/KEY and uses a cryptographic hash function to generate one-time passwords for use as authentication information in system login and in other processes that need protection against replay attacks.

Shirey Informational Page 205]

RFC 4949 Internet Security Glossary, Version 2 August 2007

([[Fair Use]] [[Source]]: [[RFC 4949])


(I) Irreversible transformation of plain text to cipher text, such that the plain text cannot be recovered from the cipher text by other than exhaustive procedures even if the cryptographic key is known. (See: brute force, encryption.)

([[Fair Use]] [[Source]]: [[RFC 4949])


(I) “A (mathematical) function, f, [that] is easy to compute, but which for a general value y in the range, it is computationally difficult to find a value x in the domain such that f(x) = y. There may be a few values of y for which finding x is not computationally difficult.” [X509]

Deprecated Usage: IDOCs SHOULD NOT use this term as a synonym for “cryptographic hash”.

([[Fair Use]] [[Source]]: [[RFC 4949])


(I) A system that can be used to provide both (a) data confidentiality and (b) traffic-flow confidentiality for network packets, and also provide © anonymity for the source of the packets.

Tutorial: The source, instead of sending a packet directly to the intended destination, sends it to an “onion routing proxy” that builds an anonymous connection through several other “onion routers” to the destination. The proxy defines a route through the “onion routing network” by encapsulating the original payload in a layered data packet called an “onion”, in which each layer defines the next hop in the route and each layer is also encrypted. Along the route, each onion router that receives the onion peels off one layer; decrypts that layer and reads from it the address of the next onion router on the route; pads the remaining onion to some constant size; and sends the padded onion to that next router.

([[Fair Use]] [[Source]]: [[RFC 4949])


(O) /U.S. DoD/ A system environment that meets at least one of the following two conditions: (a) Application developers (including maintainers) do not have sufficient clearance or authorization to provide an acceptable presumption that they have not introduced malicious logic. (b) Configuration control does not provide sufficient assurance that applications and the equipment are protected against the introduction of malicious logic prior to and during the operation of system applications. [NCS04] (See: “first law” under “Courtney's laws”. Compare: closed security environment.)

Shirey Informational Page 206]

RFC 4949 Internet Security Glossary, Version 2 August 2007

([[Fair Use]] [[Source]]: [[RFC 4949])


(N) /U.S. Government/ “Storage of classified information within an accredited facility, but not in General Services Administration approved secure containers, while the facility is unoccupied by authorized personnel.” [C4009]

([[Fair Use]] [[Source]]: [[RFC 4949])


(N) A joint ISO/ITU-T standard [I7498-1] for a seven-layer, architectural communication framework for interconnection of computers in networks. (See: OSIRM Security Architecture. Compare: Internet Protocol Suite.)

Tutorial: OSIRM-based standards include communication protocols that are mostly incompatible with the IPS, but also include security models, such as X.509, that are used in the Internet.

The OSIRM layers, from highest to lowest, are (7) Application, (6) Presentation, (5) Session, (4) Transport, (3) Network, (2) Data Link, and (1) Physical.

Usage: This Glossary refers to OSIRM layers by number to avoid confusing them with IPS layers, which are referred to by name.

Some unknown person described how the OSIRM layers correspond to the seven deadly sins:

7. Wrath: Application is always angry with the mess it sees below itself. (Hey! Who is it to be pointing fingers?) 6. Sloth: Presentation is too lazy to do anything productive by itself. 5. Lust: Session is always craving and demanding what truly belongs to Application's functionality. 4. Avarice: Transport wants all of the end-to-end functionality. (Of course, it deserves it, but life isn't fair.) 3. Gluttony: (Connection-Oriented) Network is overweight and overbearing after trying too often to eat Transport's lunch. 2. Envy: Poor Data Link is always starved for attention. (With Asynchronous Transfer Mode, maybe now it is feeling less neglected.) 1. Pride: Physical has managed to avoid much of the controversy, and nearly all of the embarrassment, suffered by the others.

John G. Fletcher described how the OSIRM layers correspond to Snow White's dwarf friends:

7. Doc: Application acts as if it is in charge, but sometimes muddles its syntax.

Shirey Informational Page 207]

RFC 4949 Internet Security Glossary, Version 2 August 2007

6. Sleepy: Presentation is indolent, being guilty of the sin of Sloth. 5. Dopey: Session is confused because its charter is not very clear. 4. Grumpy: Transport is irritated because Network has encroached on Transport's turf. 3. Happy: Network smiles for the same reason that Transport is irritated. 2. Sneezy: Data Link makes loud noises in the hope of attracting attention. 1. Bashful: Physical quietly does its work, unnoticed by the others.

([[Fair Use]] [[Source]]: [[RFC 4949])


(I) Synonym for “system integrity”; this synonym emphasizes the actual performance of system functions rather than just the ability to perform them.

([[Fair Use]] [[Source]]: [[RFC 4949])


1. (I) System capabilities, or performance of system functions, that are needed either (a) to securely manage a system or (b) to manage security features of a system. (Compare: operations security (OPSEC).)

Usage: IDOCs that use this term SHOULD state a definition because (a) the definition provided here is general and vague and (b) the term could easily be confused with “operations security”, which is a different concept.

Tutorial: For example, in the context of an Internet service provider, the term could refer to capabilities to manage network devices in the event of attacks, simplify troubleshooting, keep track of events that affect system integrity, help analyze sources of attacks, and provide administrators with control over network addresses and protocols to help mitigate the most common attacks and exploits. [R3871]

2. (D) Synonym for “administrative security”.

Deprecated Definition: IDOCs SHOULD NOT use this term as a synonym for “administrative security”. Any type of security may affect system operations; therefore, the term may be misleading. Instead, use “administrative security”, “communication security”, “computer security”, “emanations security”, “personnel security”, “physical security”, or whatever specific type is meant. (See: security architecture. Compare: operational integrity, OPSEC.)

Shirey Informational Page 208]

RFC 4949 Internet Security Glossary, Version 2 August 2007

([[Fair Use]] [[Source]]: [[RFC 4949])


(I) A process to identify, control, and protect evidence of the planning and execution of sensitive activities and operations, and thereby prevent potential adversaries from gaining knowledge of capabilities and intentions. (See: communications cover. Compare: operational security.)

([[Fair Use]] [[Source]]: [[RFC 4949])


(I) A person who has been authorized to direct selected functions of a system. (Compare: manager, user.)

Usage: IDOCs that use this term SHOULD state a definition for it because a system operator may or may not be treated as a “user”.

([[Fair Use]] [[Source]]: [[RFC 4949])


1. (I) Abbreviation for “operations security”.

2. (D) Abbreviation for “operational security”.

Deprecated Usage: IDOCs SHOULD NOT use this abbreviation for “operational security” (as defined in this Glossary), because its use for “operations security” has been well established for many years, particular in the military community.

([[Fair Use]] [[Source]]: [[RFC 4949])


See: organizational registration authority.

([[Fair Use]] [[Source]]: [[RFC 4949])


(D) /slang/ Synonym for “Trusted Computer System Evaluation Criteria” [CSC1, DoD1].

Deprecated Usage: IDOCs SHOULD NOT use this term as a synonym for “Trusted Computer System Evaluation Criteria” [CSC1, DoD1]. Instead, use the full, proper name of the document or, in subsequent references, the abbreviation “TCSEC”. (See: Deprecated Usage under “Green Book”.)

([[Fair Use]] [[Source]]: [[RFC 4949])


1. (I) An X.509 public-key certificate in which the “subjectfield contains the name of an institution or set (e.g., a business, government, school, labor union, club, ethnic group, nationality, system, or group of individuals playing the same role), rather than the name of an individual person or device. (Compare: persona certificate, role certificate.)

Tutorial: Such a certificate might be issued for one of the following purposes:

Shirey Informational Page 209]

RFC 4949 Internet Security Glossary, Version 2 August 2007

- To enable an individual to prove membership in the organization. - To enable an individual to represent the organization, i.e., to act in its name and with its powers or permissions.

2. (O) /MISSI/ A type of MISSI X.509 public-key certificate that is issued to support organizational message handling for the U.S. DoD's Defense Message System.

([[Fair Use]] [[Source]]: [[RFC 4949])


1. (I) /PKI/ An RA for an organization.

2. (O) /MISSI/ An end entity that (a) assists a PCA, CA, or SCA to register other end entities, by gathering, verifying, and entering data and forwarding it to the signing authority and (b) may also assist with card management functions. An ORA is a local administrative authority, and the term refers both to the role and to the person who plays that role. An ORA does not sign certificates, CRLs, or CKLs. (See: no-PIN ORA, SSO-PIN ORA, user- PIN ORA.)

([[Fair Use]] [[Source]]: [[RFC 4949])


(D) Synonym for “data origin authentication”. (See: authentication, data origin authentication.)

Deprecated Term: IDOCs SHOULD NOT use this term; it suggests careless use of the internationally standardized termdata origin authentication” and also could be confused with “peer entity authentication.”

([[Fair Use]] [[Source]]: [[RFC 4949])


(D) Synonym for “data origin authentication”. (See: authenticity, data origin authentication.)

Deprecated Term: IDOCs SHOULD NOT use this term; it suggests careless use of the internationally standardized termdata origin authentication” and mixes concepts in a potentially misleading way.

([[Fair Use]] [[Source]]: [[RFC 4949])


(N) See: Open Systems Interconnection Reference Model.

([[Fair Use]] [[Source]]: [[RFC 4949])


(N) The part of the OSIRM [I7498-2] that specifies the security services and security mechanisms that can be applied to protect communications between two systems. (See: security architecture.)

Shirey Informational Page 210]

RFC 4949 Internet Security Glossary, Version 2 August 2007

Tutorial: This part of the OSIRM includes an allocation of security services to protocol layers. The following table shows which security services (see definitions in this Glossary) are permitted by the OSIRM in each of its layers. (Also, an application process that operates above the Application Layer may itself provide security services.) Similarly, the table suggests which services are suitable for each IPS layer. However, explaining and justifying these allocations is beyond the scope of this Glossary.

Legend for Table Entries: O = Yes, [I7498-2] permits the service in this OSIRM layer. I = Yes, the service can be incorporated in this IPS layer.

IPS Protocol Layers +—————————————–+

 ]] | [[[[Network]]]] | [[ [[Net]] ]] | [[In-]] | [[ Trans ]] | [[  [[Application]]  ]] | [[
 ]] | [[  H/W  ]] | [[Inter]] | [[ter]] | [[ -[[port]] ]] | [[]] | [[
 ]] | [[ ]] | [[-[[face]]]] | [[[[net]]]] | [[ ]] | [[]] | [[
OSIRM Protocol Layers +—————————————–+
 ]] | [[  1  ]] | [[  2  ]] | [[  3  ]] | [[  4  ]] | [[  5  ]] | [[  6  ]] | [[  7  ]] | [[
Confidentiality +—————————————–+ - Datagram]] | O I | O I | O I | O I | rfc_4949_internet_security_glossary_definitions_o | O * | O I | - Selective [[Field ]] | rfc_4949_internet_security_glossary_definitions_o | rfc_4949_internet_security_glossary_definitions_o | I | rfc_4949_internet_security_glossary_definitions_o | rfc_4949_internet_security_glossary_definitions_o | O * | O I | - [[Traffic Flow ]] | O | rfc_4949_internet_security_glossary_definitions_o | O | rfc_4949_internet_security_glossary_definitions_o | rfc_4949_internet_security_glossary_definitions_o | rfc_4949_internet_security_glossary_definitions_o | O | -- Full | I | rfc_4949_internet_security_glossary_definitions_o | rfc_4949_internet_security_glossary_definitions_o | rfc_4949_internet_security_glossary_definitions_o | rfc_4949_internet_security_glossary_definitions_o | rfc_4949_internet_security_glossary_definitions_o | rfc_4949_internet_security_glossary_definitions_o | -- [[Partial ]] | rfc_4949_internet_security_glossary_definitions_o | I | I | rfc_4949_internet_security_glossary_definitions_o | rfc_4949_internet_security_glossary_definitions_o | rfc_4949_internet_security_glossary_definitions_o | I | Integrity +-----------------------------------------+ - [[Datagram]] | I | I | O I | O I | rfc_4949_internet_security_glossary_definitions_o | rfc_4949_internet_security_glossary_definitions_o | O I | - Selective [[Field ]] | rfc_4949_internet_security_glossary_definitions_o | rfc_4949_internet_security_glossary_definitions_o | I | rfc_4949_internet_security_glossary_definitions_o | rfc_4949_internet_security_glossary_definitions_o | rfc_4949_internet_security_glossary_definitions_o | O I | - [[Stream ]] | rfc_4949_internet_security_glossary_definitions_o | rfc_4949_internet_security_glossary_definitions_o | O I | O I | rfc_4949_internet_security_glossary_definitions_o | rfc_4949_internet_security_glossary_definitions_o | O I | [[Authentication+—————————————–+ - Peer Entity]] | rfc_4949_internet_security_glossary_definitions_o | I | O I | O I | rfc_4949_internet_security_glossary_definitions_o | rfc_4949_internet_security_glossary_definitions_o | O I | - [[Data Origin]] | rfc_4949_internet_security_glossary_definitions_o | I | O I | O I | rfc_4949_internet_security_glossary_definitions_o | rfc_4949_internet_security_glossary_definitions_o | O I | [[Access Control+—————————————–+ - type as appropriate ]] | rfc_4949_internet_security_glossary_definitions_o | I | O I | O I | rfc_4949_internet_security_glossary_definitions_o | rfc_4949_internet_security_glossary_definitions_o | O I | Non-Repudiation +-----------------------------------------+ - of Origin | rfc_4949_internet_security_glossary_definitions_o | rfc_4949_internet_security_glossary_definitions_o | rfc_4949_internet_security_glossary_definitions_o | rfc_4949_internet_security_glossary_definitions_o | rfc_4949_internet_security_glossary_definitions_o | rfc_4949_internet_security_glossary_definitions_o | O I | - of Receipt | rfc_4949_internet_security_glossary_definitions_o | rfc_4949_internet_security_glossary_definitions_o | rfc_4949_internet_security_glossary_definitions_o | rfc_4949_internet_security_glossary_definitions_o | rfc_4949_internet_security_glossary_definitions_o | rfc_4949_internet_security_glossary_definitions_o | O I | +-----------------------------------------+ ([[Fair Use Source: over-the-air re[[keying.
([[Fair Use]] [[Source]]: [[RFC 4949])


(I) See: One-Time Password.

Shirey Informational Page 211]

RFC 4949 Internet Security Glossary, Version 2 August 2007

([[Fair Use]] [[Source]]: [[RFC 4949])


(I) /adjective, adverb/ Information transfer using a channel or method that is outside (i.e., separate from or different from) the main channel or normal method.

Tutorial: Out-of-band mechanisms are often used to distribute shared secrets (e.g., a symmetric key) or other sensitive information items (e.g., a root key) that are needed to initialize or otherwise enable the operation of cryptography or other security mechanisms. Example: Using postal mail to distribute printed or magnetic media containing symmetric cryptographic keys for use in Internet encryption devices. (See: key distribution.)

([[Fair Use]] [[Source]]: [[RFC 4949])


(N) A block cipher mode that modifies ECB mode to operate on plaintext segments of variable length less than or equal to the block length. [FP081] (See: block cipher, [SP38A].)

Tutorial: This mode operates by directly using the algorithm's previously generated output block as the algorithm's next input block (i.e., by “feeding back” the output block) and combining (exclusive OR-ing) the output block with the next plaintext segment (of block length or less) to form the next ciphertext segment.

([[Fair Use]] [[Source]]: [[RFC 4949])


(I) See: secondary definition under “attack”. Compare: outsider.)

([[Fair Use]] [[Source]]: [[RFC 4949])


(I) A user (usually a person) that accesses a system from a position that is outside the system's security perimeter. (Compare: authorized user, insider, unauthorized user.)

Tutorial: The actions performed by an outsider in accessing the system may be either authorized or unauthorized; i.e., an outsider may act either as an authorized user or as an unauthorized user.

([[Fair Use]] [[Source]]: [[RFC 4949])


(N) Changing a key in a remote cryptographic device by sending a new key directly to the device via a channel that the device is protecting. [C4009]

([[Fair Use]] [[Source]]: [[RFC 4949])


(I) /threat action/ See: secondary definition under “obstruction”.


Fair Use Sources

Fair Use Sources:

Access Control, Access Control List, Access Management, Account Lockout, Account Takeover, Active Defense, Active Directory Security, Active Scanning, Advanced Encryption Standard, Advanced Persistent Threat, Adversarial Machine Learning, Adware, Air Gap, Algorithmic Security, Anomaly Detection, Anti-Malware, Antivirus Software, Anti-Spyware, Application Blacklisting, Application Layer Security, Application Security, Application Whitelisting, Arbitrary Code Execution, Artificial Intelligence Security, Asset Discovery, Asset Management, Asymmetric Encryption, Asymmetric Key Cryptography, Attack Chain, Attack Simulation, Attack Surface, Attack Vector, Attribute-Based Access Control, Audit Logging, Audit Trail, Authentication, Authentication Protocol, Authentication Token, Authorization, Automated Threat Detection, AutoRun Malware, Backdoor, Backup and Recovery, Baseline Configuration, Behavioral Analysis, Behavioral Biometrics, Behavioral Monitoring, Biometric Authentication, Black Hat Hacker, Black Hat Hacking, Blacklisting, Blockchain Security, Blue Team, Boot Sector Virus, Botnet, Botnet Detection, Boundary Protection, Brute Force Attack, Brute Force Protection, Buffer Overflow, Buffer Overflow Attack, Bug Bounty Program, Business Continuity Plan, Business Email Compromise, BYOD Security, Cache Poisoning, CAPTCHA Security, Certificate Authority, Certificate Pinning, Chain of Custody, Challenge-Response Authentication, Challenge-Handshake Authentication Protocol, Chief Information Security Officer, Cipher Block Chaining, Cipher Suite, Ciphertext, Circuit-Level Gateway, Clickjacking, Cloud Access Security Broker, Cloud Encryption, Cloud Security, Cloud Security Alliance, Cloud Security Posture Management, Code Injection, Code Review, Code Signing, Cold Boot Attack, Command Injection, Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures, Common Vulnerability Scoring System, Compromised Account, Computer Emergency Response Team, Computer Forensics, Computer Security Incident Response Team, Confidentiality, Confidentiality Agreement, Configuration Baseline, Configuration Management, Content Filtering, Continuous Monitoring, Cross-Site Request Forgery, Cross-Site Request Forgery Protection, Cross-Site Scripting, Cross-Site Scripting Protection, Cross-Platform Malware, Cryptanalysis, Cryptanalysis Attack, Cryptographic Algorithm, Cryptographic Hash Function, Cryptographic Key, Cryptography, Cryptojacking, Cyber Attack, Cyber Deception, Cyber Defense, Cyber Espionage, Cyber Hygiene, Cyber Insurance, Cyber Kill Chain, Cyber Resilience, Cyber Terrorism, Cyber Threat, Cyber Threat Intelligence, Cyber Threat Intelligence Sharing, Cyber Warfare, Cybersecurity, Cybersecurity Awareness, Cybersecurity Awareness Training, Cybersecurity Compliance, Cybersecurity Framework, Cybersecurity Incident, Cybersecurity Incident Response, Cybersecurity Insurance, Cybersecurity Maturity Model, Cybersecurity Policy, Cybersecurity Risk, Cybersecurity Risk Assessment, Cybersecurity Strategy, Dark Web Monitoring, Data at Rest Encryption, Data Breach, Data Breach Notification, Data Classification, Data Encryption, Data Encryption Standard, Data Exfiltration, Data Governance, Data Integrity, Data Leakage Prevention, Data Loss Prevention, Data Masking, Data Mining Attacks, Data Privacy, Data Protection, Data Retention Policy, Data Sanitization, Data Security, Data Wiping, Deauthentication Attack, Decryption, Decryption Key, Deep Packet Inspection, Defense in Depth, Defense-in-Depth Strategy, Deidentification, Demilitarized Zone, Denial of Service Attack, Denial-of-Service Attack, Device Fingerprinting, Dictionary Attack, Digital Certificate, Digital Certificate Management, Digital Forensics, Digital Forensics and Incident Response, Digital Rights Management, Digital Signature, Disaster Recovery, Disaster Recovery Plan, Distributed Denial of Service Attack, Distributed Denial-of-Service Attack, Distributed Denial-of-Service Mitigation, DNS Amplification Attack, DNS Poisoning, DNS Security Extensions, DNS Spoofing, Domain Hijacking, Domain Name System Security, Drive Encryption, Drive-by Download, Dumpster Diving, Dynamic Analysis, Dynamic Code Analysis, Dynamic Data Exchange Exploits, Eavesdropping, Eavesdropping Attack, Edge Security, Email Encryption, Email Security, Email Spoofing, Embedded Systems Security, Employee Awareness Training, Encapsulation Security Payload, Encryption, Encryption Algorithm, Encryption Key, Endpoint Detection and Response, Endpoint Protection Platform, Endpoint Security, Enterprise Mobility Management, Ethical Hacking, Ethical Hacking Techniques, Event Correlation, Event Logging, Exploit, Exploit Development, Exploit Framework, Exploit Kit, Exploit Prevention, Exposure, Extended Detection and Response, Extended Validation Certificate, External Threats, False Negative, False Positive, File Integrity Monitoring, File Transfer Protocol Security, Fileless Malware, Firmware Analysis, Firmware Security, Firewall, Firewall Rules, Forensic Analysis, Forensic Investigation, Formal Methods in Security, Formal Verification, Fraud Detection, Full Disk Encryption, Fuzz Testing, Fuzz Testing Techniques, Gateway Security, General Data Protection Regulation, General Data Protection Regulation Compliance, Governance Risk Compliance, Governance, Risk, and Compliance, Gray Hat Hacker, Gray Hat Hacking, Group Policy, Group Policy Management, Hacker, Hacking, Hardware Security Module, Hash Collision Attack, Hash Function, Hashing, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act Compliance, Heartbleed Vulnerability, Heuristic Analysis, Heuristic Detection, High-Availability Clustering, Honeynet, Honeypot, Honeypot Detection, Host-Based Intrusion Detection System, Host Intrusion Prevention System, Host-Based Intrusion Prevention System, Hypervisor Security, Identity and Access Management, Identity Theft, Incident Handling, Incident Response, Incident Response Plan, Incident Response Team, Industrial Control Systems Security, Information Assurance, Information Security, Information Security Management System, Information Security Policy, Information Systems Security Engineering, Insider Threat, Integrity, Intellectual Property Theft, Interactive Application Security Testing, Internet of Things Security, Intrusion Detection System, Intrusion Prevention System, IP Spoofing, ISO 27001, IT Security Governance, Jailbreaking, JavaScript Injection, Juice Jacking, Key Escrow, Key Exchange, Key Management, Keylogger, Kill Chain, Knowledge-Based Authentication, Lateral Movement, Layered Security, Least Privilege, Lightweight Directory Access Protocol, Log Analysis, Log Management, Logic Bomb, Macro Virus, Malicious Code, Malicious Insider, Malicious Software, Malvertising, Malware, Malware Analysis, Man-in-the-Middle Attack, Mandatory Access Control, Mandatory Vacation Policy, Mass Assignment Vulnerability, Media Access Control Filtering, Message Authentication Code, Mobile Device Management, Multi-Factor Authentication, Multifunction Device Security, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Network Access Control, Network Security, Network Security Monitoring, Network Segmentation, Network Tap, Non-Repudiation, Obfuscation Techniques, Offensive Security, Open Authorization, Open Web Application Security Project, Operating System Hardening, Operational Technology Security, Packet Filtering, Packet Sniffing, Pass the Hash Attack, Password Cracking, Password Policy, Patch Management, Penetration Testing, Penetration Testing Execution Standard, Perfect Forward Secrecy, Peripheral Device Security, Pharming, Phishing, Physical Security, Piggybacking, Plaintext, Point-to-Point Encryption, Policy Enforcement, Polymorphic Malware, Port Knocking, Port Scanning, Post-Exploitation, Pretexting, Preventive Controls, Privacy Impact Assessment, Privacy Policy, Privilege Escalation, Privilege Management, Privileged Access Management, Procedure Masking, Proactive Threat Hunting, Protected Health Information, Protected Information, Protection Profile, Proxy Server, Public Key Cryptography, Public Key Infrastructure, Purple Teaming, Quantum Cryptography, Quantum Key Distribution, Ransomware, Ransomware Attack, Red Teaming, Redundant Array of Independent Disks, Remote Access, Remote Access Trojan, Remote Code Execution, Replay Attack, Reverse Engineering, Risk Analysis, Risk Assessment, Risk Management, Risk Mitigation, Role-Based Access Control, Root of Trust, Rootkit, Salami Attack, Sandbox, Sandboxing, Secure Coding, Secure File Transfer Protocol, Secure Hash Algorithm, Secure Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions, Secure Shell Protocol, Secure Socket Layer, Secure Sockets Layer, Secure Software Development Life Cycle, Security Assertion Markup Language, Security Audit, Security Awareness Training, Security Breach, Security Controls, Security Event Management, Security Governance, Security Incident, Security Incident Response, Security Information and Event Management, Security Monitoring, Security Operations Center, Security Orchestration, Security Policy, Security Posture, Security Token, Security Vulnerability, Segmentation, Session Fixation, Session Hijacking, Shoulder Surfing, Signature-Based Detection, Single Sign-On, Skimming, Smishing, Sniffing, Social Engineering, Social Engineering Attack, Software Bill of Materials, Software Composition Analysis, Software Exploit, Software Security, Spear Phishing, Spoofing, Spyware, SQL Injection, Steganography, Supply Chain Attack, Supply Chain Security, Symmetric Encryption, Symmetric Key Cryptography, System Hardening, System Integrity, Tabletop Exercise, Tailgating, Threat Actor, Threat Assessment, Threat Hunting, Threat Intelligence, Threat Modeling, Ticket Granting Ticket, Time-Based One-Time Password, Tokenization, Traffic Analysis, Transport Layer Security, Transport Security Layer, Trapdoor, Trojan Horse, Two-Factor Authentication, Two-Person Control, Typosquatting, Unauthorized Access, Unified Threat Management, User Behavior Analytics, User Rights Management, Virtual Private Network, Virus, Vishing, Vulnerability, Vulnerability Assessment, Vulnerability Disclosure, Vulnerability Management, Vulnerability Scanning, Watering Hole Attack, Whaling, White Hat Hacker, White Hat Hacking, Whitelisting, Wi-Fi Protected Access, Wi-Fi Security, Wi-Fi Protected Setup, Worm, Zero-Day Exploit, Zero Trust Security, Zombie Computer

Cybersecurity: DevSecOps - Security Automation, Cloud Security - Cloud Native Security (AWS Security - Azure Security - GCP Security - IBM Cloud Security - Oracle Cloud Security, Container Security, Docker Security, Podman Security, Kubernetes Security, Google Anthos Security, Red Hat OpenShift Security); CIA Triad (Confidentiality - Integrity - Availability, Authorization - OAuth, Identity and Access Management (IAM), JVM Security (Java Security, Spring Security, Micronaut Security, Quarkus Security, Helidon Security, MicroProfile Security, Dropwizard Security, Vert.x Security, Play Framework Security, Akka Security, Ratpack Security, Netty Security, Spark Framework Security, Kotlin Security - Ktor Security, Scala Security, Clojure Security, Groovy Security;

, JavaScript Security, HTML Security, HTTP Security - HTTPS Security - SSL Security - TLS Security, CSS Security - Bootstrap Security - Tailwind Security, Web Storage API Security (localStorage Security, sessionStorage Security), Cookie Security, IndexedDB Security, TypeScript Security, Node.js Security, NPM Security, Deno Security, Express.js Security, React Security, Angular Security, Vue.js Security, Next.js Security, Remix.js Security, PWA Security, SPA Security, Svelts.js Security, Ionic Security, Web Components Security, Nuxt.js Security, Z Security, htmx Security

Python Security - Django Security - Flask Security - Pandas Security,

Database Security (Database Security on Kubernetes, Database Security on Containers / Database Security on Docker, Cloud Database Security - DBaaS Security, Concurrent Programming and Database Security, Functional Concurrent Programming and Database Security, Async Programming and Databases Security, MySQL Security, Oracle Database Security, Microsoft SQL Server Security, MongoDB Security, PostgreSQL Security, SQLite Security, Amazon RDS Security, IBM Db2 Security, MariaDB Security, Redis Security (Valkey Security), Cassandra Security, Amazon Aurora Security, Microsoft Azure SQL Database Security, Neo4j Security, Google Cloud SQL Security, Firebase Realtime Database Security, Apache HBase Security, Amazon DynamoDB Security, Couchbase Server Security, Elasticsearch Security, Teradata Database Security, Memcached Security, Infinispan Security, Amazon Redshift Security, SQLite Security, CouchDB Security, Apache Kafka Security, IBM Informix Security, SAP HANA Security, RethinkDB Security, InfluxDB Security, MarkLogic Security, ArangoDB Security, RavenDB Security, VoltDB Security, Apache Derby Security, Cosmos DB Security, Hive Security, Apache Flink Security, Google Bigtable Security, Hadoop Security, HP Vertica Security, Alibaba Cloud Table Store Security, InterSystems Caché Security, Greenplum Security, Apache Ignite Security, FoundationDB Security, Amazon Neptune Security, FaunaDB Security, QuestDB Security, Presto Security, TiDB Security, NuoDB Security, ScyllaDB Security, Percona Server for MySQL Security, Apache Phoenix Security, EventStoreDB Security, SingleStore Security, Aerospike Security, MonetDB Security, Google Cloud Spanner Security, SQream Security, GridDB Security, MaxDB Security, RocksDB Security, TiKV Security, Oracle NoSQL Database Security, Google Firestore Security, Druid Security, SAP IQ Security, Yellowbrick Data Security, InterSystems IRIS Security, InterBase Security, Kudu Security, eXtremeDB Security, OmniSci Security, Altibase Security, Google Cloud Bigtable Security, Amazon QLDB Security, Hypertable Security, ApsaraDB for Redis Security, Pivotal Greenplum Security, MapR Database Security, Informatica Security, Microsoft Access Security, Tarantool Security, Blazegraph Security, NeoDatis Security, FileMaker Security, ArangoDB Security, RavenDB Security, AllegroGraph Security, Alibaba Cloud ApsaraDB for PolarDB Security, DuckDB Security, Starcounter Security, EventStore Security, ObjectDB Security, Alibaba Cloud AnalyticDB for PostgreSQL Security, Akumuli Security, Google Cloud Datastore Security, Skytable Security, NCache Security, FaunaDB Security, OpenEdge Security, Amazon DocumentDB Security, HyperGraphDB Security, Citus Data Security, Objectivity/DB). Database drivers (JDBC Security, ODBC), ORM (Hibernate Security, Microsoft Entity Framework), SQL Operators and Functions Security, Database IDEs (JetBrains DataSpell Security, SQL Server Management Studio Security, MySQL Workbench Security, Oracle SQL Developer Security, SQLiteStudio),

Programming Language Security ((1. Python Security, 2. JavaScript Security, 3. Java Security, 4. C Sharp Security | Security, 5. CPP Security | C++ Security, 6. PHP Security, 7. TypeScript Security, 8. Ruby Security, 9. C Security, 10. Swift Security, 11. R Security, 12. Objective-C Security, 13. Scala Security, 14. Golang Security, 15. Kotlin Security, 16. Rust Security, 17. Dart Security, 18. Lua Security, 19. Perl Security, 20. Haskell Security, 21. Julia Security, 22. Clojure Security, 23. Elixir Security, 24. F Sharp Security | Security, 25. Assembly Language Security, 26. Shell Script Security / bash Security, 27. SQL Security, 28. Groovy Security, 29. PowerShell Security, 30. MATLAB Security, 31. VBA Security, 32. Racket Security, 33. Scheme Security, 34. Prolog Security, 35. Erlang Security, 36. Ada Security, 37. Fortran Security, 38. COBOL Security, 39. Lua Security, 40. VB.NET Security, 41. Lisp Security, 42. SAS Security, 43. D Security, 44. LabVIEW Security, 45. PL/SQL Security, 46. Delphi/Object Pascal Security, 47. ColdFusion Security, 49. CLIST Security, 50. REXX);

OS Security, Mobile Security: Android Security - Kotlin Security - Java Security, iOS Security - Swift Security; Windows Security - Windows Server Security, Linux Security (Ubuntu Security, Debian Security, RHEL Security, Fedora Security), UNIX Security (FreeBSD Security), IBM z Mainframe Security (RACF Security), Passwords (Windows Passwords, Linux Passwords, FreeBSD Passwords, Android Passwords, iOS Passwords, macOS Passwords, IBM z/OS Passwords), Password alternatives (Passwordless, Personal Access Token (PAT), GitHub Personal Access Token (PAT), Passkeys), Hacking (Ethical Hacking, White Hat, Black Hat, Grey Hat), Pentesting (Red Team - Blue Team - Purple Team), Cybersecurity Certifications (CEH, GIAC, CISM, CompTIA Security Plus, CISSP), Mitre Framework, Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE), Cybersecurity Bibliography, Cybersecurity Courses, Firewalls, CI/CD Security (GitHub Actions Security, Azure DevOps Security, Jenkins Security, Circle CI Security), Functional Programming and Cybersecurity, Cybersecurity and Concurrency, Cybersecurity and Data Science - Cybersecurity and Databases, Cybersecurity and Machine Learning, Cybersecurity Glossary (RFC 4949 Internet Security Glossary), Awesome Cybersecurity, Cybersecurity GitHub, Cybersecurity Topics (navbar_security - see also navbar_aws_security, navbar_azure_security, navbar_gcp_security, navbar_k8s_security, navbar_docker_security, navbar_podman_security, navbar_mainframe_security, navbar_ibm_cloud_security, navbar_oracle_cloud_security, navbar_database_security, navbar_windows_security, navbar_linux_security, navbar_macos_security, navbar_android_security, navbar_ios_security, navbar_os_security, navbar_firewalls, navbar_encryption, navbar_passwords, navbar_iam, navbar_pentesting, navbar_privacy, navbar_rfc)

Request for Comments (RFC): List of RFCs, GitHub RFCs, Awesome RFCs, (navbar_rfc - see also navbar_network_security, navbar_security, navbar_networking)


Cloud Monk is Retired ( for now). Buddha with you. © 2025 and Beginningless Time - Present Moment - Three Times: The Buddhas or Fair Use. Disclaimers

SYI LU SENG E MU CHYWE YE. NAN. WEI LA YE. WEI LA YE. SA WA HE.